Our natural reality, from the smallest to the biggest, consists entirely of complex functional machines. Quanta, atoms, molecules, organisms, water, air, mountains, clouds, and celestial bodies are or are made up of complex functional machines.

An atom, for example, is a perpetual motion dynamo with parts traveling at near the speed of light.
​

⌕ Click to enlarge

​Inside atoms are electron, proton, and neutron dynamic machines. Inside those are quanta machines that seem to move instantaneously and can only be speculated about with esoteric math.

⌕ Click to enlarge

​Inside quanta are things of no substance at all and likened to thoughts. In other words, way down underneath, all of reality, including us, is mind.
 
A rock is not just an uninteresting static thing. It's a broiling cauldron of minuscule invisible atomic and quanta machines operating at blinding speeds yet somehow manifesting to our eye and brain machines as a physical rock.
 
On an infinitely large scale, atoms and quanta make up stars, planets, the sun, and the moon moving as a gigantic machine day after day, night after night. Its precision is like the best timepieces humans have ever made. In fact, our time and calendars are modeled after this gigantic clock machine in the sky.

⌕ Click to enlarge

​We, and every other living organism are made of quantum and atomic machines inside of biochemical machines, that underlie genetic, physiologic, anatomic, neurologic, and thought machines.

⌕ Click to enlarge


⌕ Click to enlarge

The functional complexity of it all is incomprehensible. Human knowledge, no matter the credentials of the most erudite expert, is a drop in an ocean of ignorance.
 
When we ask the question of where we and all the machine stuff in the natural world come from, the same conclusion must be made as with any artificial machine.
 
Machines require intelligent origination. There are no exceptions.
 
The more complex, functional, and autonomous the machine, the more intelligence necessary. The more incomprehensible the machine, the more incomprehensible its creator.
 
Logical syllogism:
 

1. Incomprehensible complex functional machines require incomprehensible creative intelligence.
   
   
2. Our physical reality is made of incomprehensible complex functional machines.
   ​
   
3. Therefore, our physical reality requires an incomprehensible Creator.

 
Nevertheless, this logic is denied by atheism, evolutionism, cosmology, and cosmogony because of unwarranted hubris and the pretense of knowing what is not known.
 
When challenged for proof that machines can come to be due to mindless spontaneity, only stories, speculations, reifications, extrapolations, composition fallacies, and ad hominem attacks are presented. This defense is passed off as "science."
 
Not one scientific experiment using the scientific method, and no empirical (repeatable, testable, falsifiable) evidence exist proving any tenet of these materialistic belief systems. This, by definition, is pseudoscience. The unyielding ardor with which materialistic beliefs and faiths are held is indicative of cult religion.
 
The necessity of an incomprehensible and infinite Creator is denied using the red herring logical fallacy that a Creator must have been created by a predecessor Creator, and that one must have been created by another… and on and on for an infinite regression of Creators.
 
However, materialism is content with an incomprehensible infinite universe and an incomprehensible first law of thermodynamics that demands that incomprehensible matter can neither be created nor destroyed.
 
So, an incomprehensible infinite Creator that cannot be created nor destroyed should be acceptable as well.
 
Particularly is this so since beginnings and ends are an illusion of the physical existence the Creator constructed. The Creator is no more limited by the creation and its laws than an inventor is limited by the creation of a nail gun or its instruction manual.
 
Moreover, many things are incomprehensible to us. Not fathoming something with our limited four-dimensional brains does not preclude its existence. In our physical shells constrained by a physical world of beginnings and ends, we cannot know or understand the infinite or know the unknowable.
 
Similarly, an ant must be content with its inability to understand our size, actions, or power. An ant has its limited place relative to us, we have our limited place relative to the Creator.

⌕ Click to enlarge

​The conclusion of a Creator does not redound to religions claiming to know the Creator by anthropomorphizing it. The Creator cannot be reduced to a bestselling holy book author or party to the thousands of man-made religions claiming esoteric Creator knowledge and "divine" laws governing our behavior with horrific penalties for infractions.
 
Religions glorify and empower their leaders, not the Creator.
 
We can only "know" the Creator by the creation itself and the gifts implanted with us. Those gifts include an autonomous physical living body dependent upon countless physical machines within machines, within machines, etc. It also includes the gifts of free will, reason, thirst for truth, and conscience we can use to grow from the difficult challenges Earth life presents.
 
If we would simply use these gifts, rather than embrace unjustified beliefs and faiths, we could transform Earth into a utopian paradise.
 
We, the provable underlying spiritual beings we are, will likely come to understand these things and the Creator better when we shed this physical existence and return to a reality where beginnings and ends have no meaning.

⌕ Click to enlarge