THE "FEED A '100% COMPLETE AND BALANCED' PROCESSED PET FOOD" MYTH

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
—William Casey CIA director 1981

The bigger the lie the greater its acceptance because people cannot believe authority figures would ignore reality.

To find truth we must hate the lie more than love accepted beliefs.

Fraud vitiates everything it touches. (common law maxim) Nudd v. Burrows (1875) 91 U.S. 416.
Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. Boyce's Executors v. Grundy (1830) 28 U.S. 210.
Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments. United States v. Throckmorton (1878) 98 JU.S. 61.70.

FORWARD
The accepted cosmogony/cosmology (origin and nature of the universe) belief is:

A Big Bang of nothing created an infinite meaningless universe containing atomic dust that gravitationally accreted into heavenly bodies including our Earthball moving in several different directions at 2.8 million mph and holding an atmosphere next to the vacuum of space while spontaneously forming life from primeval sludge that then evolved into complicated rocks called humans with no free will.

Long ago it became clear to me that the materialistic evolutionary part of that credo was false.

But I was on board with the cosmology part. After all, we see rocket ships going to and fro, there is a "Space Force," pictures of Earth and planets abound, astronauts float around and in the International Space Station, thousands of people and billions of dollars support it, and, of course, "all" the experts believe.

To question this is to be a conspiracy theorist, misinformationist, or even a lunatic. Oh my, we must, after all, follow the crowd.

The idea that we are being lied to about space didn't even enter my mind until a few months ago when what was left of my naive and trusting innocence had been totally demolished with the COVID-19 fraud.

We, the crowd, extend our trust to institutions charged with looking after our interests. But government, Big Medicine, education, media, industry, Big Tech, science, and NASA chase money, their own security, and even power over us.

That should not inspire confidence in beliefs they create, promote, protect with censorship, and even demand acceptance of.

If we want truth, we have to find it ourselves. To do that requires the opposite of trusting in others. It means sleuthing what the powers that be try to hide from us in internet archives, banned videos, censored "disinformation," and what "fact checkers" say isn't so.

Probing into the subject I was stunned to learn that:

Nobody, including any scientist, can prove any aspect of the approved cosmogony/cosmology belief using experimentation and the scientific method.

That means unproven beliefs, stories, and even fakery are being passed off as science and truth.

This subject may seem inconsequential to everyday life. But that's only true if we aren't being lied to about it. If the truth is being hidden from us, we can be sure of one thing, it's not being done for our benefit.

Truth seekers learn that the scale and ostentatiousness of lies being fed to us means nothing can be tacitly trusted.

Everything of importance from government, media, industry, medicine, education, economics, science, history, religion, and popular society must be assumed to be false unless we prove otherwise by doing our homework and thinking critically.

This series will provide wake-up information to help you discover lies as big as the universe.

1/30/2025

1. THE "FEED A '100% COMPLETE AND BALANCED' PROCESSED PET FOOD" MYTH

From Dr. Wysong's Publications

Click to enlarge, Ctrl + to enlarge further; Ctrl 0 to return to 100%

Is commercial "100% complete and balanced" pet food really complete? As explained in my answer, there is a hidden flaw in this claim that pet owners don't realize, but pets do.

Imagine if a cereal box promised "100% complete and balanced nutrition" for life, and that eating nothing else would keep you perfectly healthy. Few people would actually believe it, and nobody would actually do it.

Yet that's exactly what is forced on pets today.

OUR WORLD IS TOO COMPLEX TO KNOW COMPLETELY
Our world is complex beyond comprehension and therefore unknowable in the "complete" sense.

Claiming that anything is 100% is like claiming perfection, total knowledge, and absolute truth.

To produce a "100% complete and balanced" pet food, producers would have to know 100% about nutrition. But nutrition is an aggregate science based upon other basic sciences, such as chemistry, physics, and biology. Since everything is not known in those sciences, food producers cannot rightfully claim to know everything there is to know about nutrition.

On top of all that great unknown, not everything about the physiology and biochemistry of animals is known.

All of these unknowns make the 100% complete food claim only the firm possibility of a definite maybe.

A "100% COMPLETE" PROCESSED FOOD REQUIRES:
1. 100% complete knowledge of food.

2. 100% complete knowledge of nutrition.

3. 100% complete knowledge of pets' bodies.

4.100% complete knowledge of #1-#3 requires 100% complete knowledge of every science.

Since #1-#4 are not true, neither are "100% complete" processed foods.

REGULATORS DON'T KNOW EITHER
Each time pet food regulatory agencies convene to decide how much of which nutrients comprise 100% completeness, debate ensues, and standards usually change.

Additionally, to determine the requirement for a certain nutrient – say protein – all other nutrients used in a food must be optimal. Otherwise, if vitamin E, for example, is in excess or deficient, it could not be known if the results of the study were due to the effects of protein or due to something amiss with the level of vitamin E.

The absolute requirements for all 26+ essential nutrients are not known because any testing for any single nutrient would require full knowledge and sufficiency of all others in the food being tested. But such knowledge does not exist. It's like cowboys trying to lasso an octopus – there are just too many loose ends.

FEEDING TRIALS ARE FLAWED
On top of those concerns and caveats is the fact that food testing in animals is done by feeding trials on caged animals. The sufficiency of a nutrient is attempted by measuring a few health indicators. But health is more than a few indicators and cannot be fully determined over the few weeks that a food is being tested. A lifetime is required. Moreover, results from caged animals do not reflect the real-life experiences of pets.

TAKEAWAY
A claim on a bag or a can can’t capture your pet’s health. Respect their complex biology and don’t fall for the comforting promise and convenience of singularly feeding a "100% complete and balanced" processed food.

This is not to say commercial products cannot have merit. But nutritional safety and optimal health require mimicking the animal's natural archetypal diet.

Offer a variety of fresh meats, organs, bones, and wholesome table leftovers. You'll be surprised at your pet's reaction and how its health responds. (Explore the internet for ideas on how this can be done, or ask.)

Finally, don't think your pet, like this little guy, doesn't notice you not being fair. Getting the same meal day after day isn't fair. They deserve respect just like we do.

▶️ Click to play video

1/30/2025
0 Comments

If you agree, disagree, have questions, or have a correction please let me know. Comment below or email me at [email protected]

COSMOLOGY LIES AS BIG AS THE UNIVERSE

Leave a Reply.