Words of wisdom and miscellaneous facts by Dr. Wysong and others. This is an accumulation over several decades and the accuracy cannot be attested to.
The following information is prepared by me alone. Facts, reasoning, and conclusions expressed are those from the cited sources or me alone. Nothing said or reported necessarily reflects the thinking or views of my relatives, colleagues, or organizations with which I have been associated. My purpose is to share discovery, open minds, promote health, and make a better world. I have no financial incentive in this work.
Click to enlarge, Ctrl + to enlarge further; Ctrl 0 to return to 100%
The sheer volume of ink and voice about the COVID-19 virus, pictures of it, tests that supposedly identify it, and the authoritative people and institutions that speak to its reality are hard to set aside.
Nevertheless, if thinking matters, let's examine the unthinkable idea that the COVID-19 virus does not exist.
Liars cannot be trusted. So, the catalog of prevarications promoted to the world could easily lead to the question of whether the virus itself is true or not. In other words, the important matter is not where the virus came from, as distractingly highlighted in news, but whether there is actually a real COVID-19 virus.
Money Drives Lies
Compounding the suspicion about the reality of C19 is the fact that vaccines (according to Bill Gates) are the most profitable business in existence. That cash cow needs a pandemic, a pathogen, to create panic and demand.
If a scary enough pathogen does not exist in nature, it is not beyond companies driven by profit and with felonious track records (Big Pharma), to fund the creation of a fake pathogen.
And there can be no confidence that Big Pharma is properly policed by the government when there is a revolving door between the two and Big Pharma economically powers politicians.
Circumstantial Evidence the COVID-19 Virus Does Not Exist
►Virtually every disease condition has been named COVID-19. The flu, pneumonia, other diseases, and even trauma have been named C19. If C19 is real, there would be no reason to do this. ❏https://www.asifthinkingmatters.com/blog/breaking-news-covid-19-according-to-cdc-data-is-the-cure-for-heart-disease-cancer-strokes-alzheimers-diabetes-flu-pneumonia-and-more
►There are no unique pathognomonic signs or symptoms of C19.
►Not one death has been proven to have been caused by a COVID-19 virus that has been isolated and identified. Human cells infected with the putative virus do not result in viral reproduction or breaking from their host cells.
❏https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud (with comments)
❏https://philosophers-stone.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The-scam-has-been-confirmed-Dsalud-November-2020.pdf (full version)
►Viral vaccines are commonly made from attenuated (tamed) viruses. This requires actual samples of the actual virus causing the disease. But no COVID vaccine has been made from C19 viruses.
►Nobody can supply a sample of the virus.
►The CDC cannot provide a sample of an isolated COVID-19 virus.
►The CDC is being sued for not supplying samples of the virus.
A reward for supplying a sample of the virus has not been taken: "WE GUARANTEE: 1,5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a coronavirus, including documented control experiments of all steps taken in the proof."
►No health agency or research institution has provided a sample of an actual C19 virus. At this site, "FOIs (Freedom Of Information requests) reveal that health/science institutions around the world (116 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever."
►The claim that a COVID-19 virus is not real is being widely censored. There would be no reason to censor this claim if COVID-19 viruses were readily available to scientists worldwide to test and prove their pathology in animals and humans. The existence of the virus would be self-evident making any claim otherwise patently ridiculous.
►Viruses ostensibly responsible for disease must be tested on people and animals to see if the disease is produced. That would have been done with C19 if isolated viruses were available. It has not.
►The underlying materialistic belief that living things and viruses can be created in a lab is fallacious. Scientists cannot create life, or even a cell, an organelle within a cell, or an actual virus. They can manipulate (usually screw up) to a degree existing biology and create strings of nucleotides on a computer, but that's really not de novo creation of real biological entities. (Complete proofs here.
A Virus Isolate Is Not an Isolated Virus
(What follows is a simplified discussion of very complex technology and omits many details. For those interested in those details, explore the links provided.)
An isolated virus is just that, a virus separated from everything else and then identified. This would need to be accomplished through centrifugation, filtration, electron microscopy, and gene mapping of the isolated virus.
That isolation process has not been done for COVID-19. Instead, a virus isolate (mixture of things) is substituted for an actual isolated virus.
That is done by taking a respiratory sample from a person supposedly infected and culturing it with various additives and cells from humans and animals. This is done to see if there is a cytopathic effect, i.e., if the cells die. If they do, it is assumed a virus from the person's sample did it and is present in the cell culture.
The mix of dead cells, various chemicals, antibiotics, natural and synthetic genetic material, and other debris in this laboratory brew is called a virus isolate. Clearly, by definition, a mixture of such things is not an isolated virus.
Nevertheless, this brew is then subjected to genetic testing to determine the RNA code of the putative virus in the brew. (RNA consists of a string of four different nucleotides, like four letters, arranged to convey the words, sentences, paragraphs, and chapters of information dictating the book (genome) of what a virus is and what it is to do.)
Virologists assume the virus in the brew contains about 30,000 nucleotides in its genome. That's because they assume many diseases are caused by viruses with genomes represented in their computer banks and in patents. These reference genomes, however, are created from known genetic strands from humans, animals, plants, and bacteria, not real viruses.
A snippet is taken of one of these RNA computer genomes assumed to be like the genome in the virus they are looking for. This snippet, called a primer, is about 18-24 nucleotides long. Scientists then synthesize the actual RNA represented in this computer primer strand. This RNA primer is then introduced into the sample mixture (virus isolate) to see if it combines with complementary RNA there.
If it does, the virologist goes back to the computers and constructs the rest of an assumed genome by a computer process called alignment. This creates a de novo in silico (computer-generated) genome, not a natural in situ one derived from an actual virus. This is bioinformatics, a nebulous synthetic process, not real biology, pathology, or science.
A primer of 18-24 nucleotide letters could not possibly determine the entire 30,000 letter genome book of a virus. Also, keep in mind that the computer genome they construct cannot be known to be that of a virus because there is no isolated virus from the patient to use as a standard.
The virus isolate brew contains billions of micro and nanoparticles including micelles, microvilli, organelles, cells and cell fragments, extracellular vesicles, exosomes . . . much of which contain RNA.
Extracellular vesicles and exosomes are useful particles for cell-to-cell communication and more. They contain RNA and are absolutely indistinguishable from viruses. They even bud from cells as viruses are pictured as doing. They have a bilipid membrane, proteins, and genetic material just like cells and organelles within cells. They are easily passed off as viruses in popular pictures. ❏https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291340
It is impossible to isolate viruses from the billions of exosomes (available commercially-- one billion/cc) present in the samples being called virus isolates.
Much of this non-virus material, including bovine fetal serum in the isolate, contains RNA. It can't be known if the RNA in the primer is detecting RNA from viruses, exosomes, cell fragments, mitochondria, fetal serum, or other intrinsic or extraneous genetic material in the culture brew. That's because these elements can have identical RNA sequences to a putative virus. Over 95% of the genetic material attributed to viruses can be found in the human genome, in the very cells used to culture the virus.
In addition, cell death, in itself, does not mean a virus is present. Lab handling, lack of nutrients, antibiotics, and other elements added to the cell culture are capable of causing cell death.
No control is used to determine if the cells would die without the inoculum from the patient. The failure to do this disqualifies all such laboratory work claimed to be virus isolation.
It's not science (truth-seeking, same thing) to, in effect, simply pull out a tiny strand of RNA from the culture soup and call it a 30,000 nucleotide COVID-19 genome. But that's what's being done. A genome is not actually being isolated from an isolated virus. Instead, the genome of the supposed virus is the product of a computer.
Further confirming this computer origin of the genome is the fact that patents for them as well as for vaccines related to them, existed before the C19 pandemic.
120 patents on sars covid 2.
Veterinary vaccines patented over 20 years ago.
Dr. Martin interview.
This suggests preplanning, not a spontaneous pandemic due to a real pathogen that floats a few feet in the air. All that was needed was a genome on a computer that could be pointed to and the collusion of powerful ill-intentioned forces around the world to create fear.
Anyone is free to go to the GSIAID genome computer bank and retrieve their own RNA primers to add to cell culture brews and access whole viral genomes they can manipulate as they wish. The result is over 70,000 in silico genomes around the world claiming to be the authentic COVID-19 genome.
But nobody can prove they have the correct genetic sequence since there is no isolated C19 virus to compare the sequence to.
This begs the question as to which of the 70,000 ostensible C19 sequences is the commercial C19 test testing for. And how would anyone know it’s the correct one since, again, there is no isolated virus for a standard? This is yet another reason the PCR test is useless other than to create worldwide panic and destroy lives and societies.
Detail on this isolate process that is passed off as an isolated virus here.
These virology experts conclude (quoting):
Perhaps most importantly, the virus isolates developed by the above methods have not proven to be pathogenic or infective in natural lab animals. No tests on animals or humans using an actual isolated virus have even been done. Thus proof of not only the virus, but of COVID-19 disease is absent.
The COVID-19 Test Is Not Based Upon an Actual Virus
Since there is no isolated virus, there is no gold standard, a prototype virus upon which a test for it can be developed. As described above, labs can develop any genome they wish and call it C19--70,000 so far and counting.
All these 70,000 variants of a cyber-phantom virus are said to be mutants, which, conveniently, further fans the flame of panic and prolongs tyranny.
With no standard real virus in hand, no test or vaccine for it can be produced.
Any such attempt would have a 1:70,000 chance of being correct, assuming one of the 70, 000 is correct, which cannot be known because there is no C19 virus as a standard.
In effect, the C19 virus genome is created with a computer program. Then a PCR test is computer-created to test for that genome. It is circular. A fictitious viral genome is copied to make a fictitious viral test; the fictitious virus test is used to test for a fictitious virus genome.
The PCR test uses computer-generated genomes as primers to detect the virus. Just as with virus isolates, any number of primers can be used since no virus standard is available. So, just as there are numerous isolates of different viral genomes, there are numerous tests that look for different viral genomes of the same phantom C19 virus.
Further invalidation of the test is the fact that the strand RNA being tested for in the PCR test is common to thousands of things other than a virus, even human cells and their components. And given that the human body reportedly contains 380 trillion viruses (more likely exosomes, etc., described above), that strand RNA can be found in a number of them too.
Even the 80% false positives reported here is way too generous.
No test for a virus that is not known can be accurate, as even the NY Times reports: "Your coronavirus test is positive, maybe it shouldn't be."
The CDC admits the unreliability. It announced in July of 2021 that it will discontinue the PCR test based upon the 59 various fabricated C-19 RNAs in use. They say they will have a new improved RNA in December that will give more consistent and reliable results, for example differentiating the flu from C19. (An admission that all this time the flu has been called C19) They explain, "FDA authorized IVDs [tests] based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene-specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole-genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation." That means all the hundreds of millions of test results around the world should be ignored.
Authorities and Researchers Admit There Is No Isolated C19 Virus
►Exhaustive documented videos, scientific refs., debates, and court proofs of virology fraud.
►What about all the deaths in Wuhan? Answer: Wuhan is a killer industrial environment with heavy 5G and 300,000 dying each year of respiratory problems.
►The process necessary to prove that the virus exists has not been done.
►The CDC instructions for PCR testing laboratories say, "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA..."
►The World Health Organization states, "Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories."
►The virus is not available to extract its in situ (within the virus) RNA. Instead, an RNA was created and called COVID1-19 RNA. They state, ". . . We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. . . Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology."
►Not isolated or tested. Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D., B.Sc., 2018 Candidate Nobel Prize in Medicine, " The reality is that the SARS-Cov-2 virus has never been isolated and tested."
►French electron microscopy expert says no C19 virus.
►If you attempt to purchase COVID-19 virus or spike protein, there are no internet search results for the former, but lots for the latter, the toxic spike protein.
One example here. Notice everything but the virus is available.
►Ph.D. claims the C19 virus or disease does not exist.
►Canadian sues for virus nonexistence.
►Article by anonymous healthcare expert questions C19 and PCR tests. ❏https://davidicke.com/2020/03/27/v-important-covid-9-super-scam-well-exposed-insider
►Dr. Stefan Lanka Virologist and Dr. R G Hamer MD on fake viruses and dangerous vaccinations. ❏https://thegnmsolution.com/viruses-and-vaccination
►Virology is a questionable science.
►Measles virus-proof of virology fraud.
►Virologists claim viruses do not cause disease.
►No literature proof of an isolated virus. "We asked Dr. Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer: 'I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.' "
►Experimental conditions in themselves can lead to new gene sequences and exosomes not previously detectable — an aspect that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock already drew attention to in her Nobel Lecture back in 1983.
►No proof of disease causation in natural animals from the C19 virus isolate. ❏https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2312-y_reference.pdf
►Dr. Derek Knauss, a clinical lab specialist focussing on virology and immunology says no C19 virus has been isolated.
►Not isolated or identified by electron microscopy, just like HIV.
►C19 does not exist. Etienne De Harven--president of the Electron Microscopy Society of America; researcher, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell professor of cell biology; professor of pathology, University of Toronto; recognized pioneer in the field of electron microscopy.
►The C19 virus isolate used for PCR tests could not infect human lung tissue. " A549 cells [human lung tissue cells] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection"
►Sars cov-2 does not cause disease.
►Stefan Lanka, German virologist says no complete viral genome has ever been found.
►Polish scientists say C19 not seen, or confused with other natural elements ". . . no virus has ever been seen or photographed in saliva."
►CDC says not infective in human cells, including lung tissue
►C19 is created by artificial sequencing
Wuhan scientists used de novo sequencing, which means sequencing a novel genome where there is no actual reference material, like an actual virus, for comparison.
►C19 is not released from cells to transmit disease
►Irish government admits COVID-19 does not exist.
►Reasons viruses cannot cause disease. Book-- "The Contagion Myth, why viruses including coronavirus are not the cause of disease."
►Viruses are indistinguishable from natural cellular endosomes and exosomes. ❏https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Extracellular_Vesicles
►C19 "viruses" seen when there is no virus. ". . . we have observed morphologically indistinguishable inclusions within podocytes and tubular epithelial cells both in patients negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as in renal biopsies from the pre–COVID-19 era. ❏https://kidney360.asnjournals.org/content/1/8/824
►Drs. Kaufman and Cowan -- no isolated C19 virus.
►Czech molecular biologist Dr. Soňa Peková explained that SARS-CoV-2 was man-made because of its deeply modified "control room": "massive gene changes and transcripts, insertions, deletions, and other complex changes in the magnitude of the RNA SARS-CoV-2 control room, if nature had created it chaotically and randomly, the virus would simply perish because it could not have functioned in an orderly manner."
►Debate: C19 was created on a computer, not by isolation. This is a rebuttal regarding a post in defense of the claim of an isolated virus, such as in papers like this. ❏https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239045
"That paper says, 'Samples were pooled and sequenced with a paired-end 75 base protocol on an Illumina MiniSeq instrument using the High-Output kit.' Meaning, they got sequences to fill in from a computer data base (more likely they just made up the genome from before), then made a library making it seem like this piece of silicon bullshit is a real organism now registered some place. They did not sequence the whole genome base by base, did not isolate the sample, and did not confirm a pathogen. This is the same way Sars-COv-2 was "found" in Wuhan in January ’20, genome found by the same piece of Illumina silicon, and started a fake pandemic leading to the oppression and deaths of many people. The PCR is then made to lead to this entry in the gene bank, so they made a genome and then test mapped it to only find this genome!! It is simply circular BS biomedical fraud shrouded in fancy terminology. . . This was a mixed cell culture sample never isolated by purification and separation ie, density gradient. Everything after that step is then looking like it’s fraud and any findings were likely just prepared on paper in advance, or the mixed cell culture sample could have been an isolated common corona virus and the print-out fudged. It’s unclear how an unpurified cell culture can lead to a Sars genome. Maybe it was a Sars variant, but not Sars-Cov-2 because its never been purified." (link lost)
►See this similar exchange between a C19 believer and skeptic. Skouratof
►Microbes are necessary for health.
►UK MHRA (British version of FDA) admits no virus. "The DNA template (acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2,GenBank: MN9089473) was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology . . . The DNA template used does not come directly from an isolate virus from an infected person." EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH UK MHRA – Exposing the genomic sequence of SARSCov2
►HIV "virus" isn't isolated just like C19 isn't - "Finally, the question as to whether HIV exists, or of whether researchers have been studying a harmless passenger virus, is a question that should be subject to open debate and careful consideration of scientific evidence or lack thereof." ❏https://www.jpands.org/vol15no3/deharven.pdf
►"It has never been possible to demonstrate by TEM one single retroviral particle in the blood plasma of any AIDS patient, even if one selects patients presenting with a so-called "high viral load." ❏https://www.jpands.org/vol15no3/deharven.pdf
►HIV not isolated. "Virus in all of us", R. Lower at al., 1996 PNAS paper
►"Out of control: AIDS and the corruption of medical science" (Farber 2006).
Just imagine if criminal DNA testing were done using the same standards as described above. If investigators found a sample of DNA at a crime scene, they could go to a gene bank and construct a duplicate and say it belonged to you. They don't take a sample of your real DNA, they just make one up and either execute you or put you in prison for life.
The assumptions that C19 is real, that the test for it is reliable, and that C19 injections are safe and effective are based on similar standards. The result is a verdict on an innocent world population resulting in the sentencing of millions to injuries and death.
Words of Wisdom:
A fool is someone who puts their life in the hands of someone whose hands seek profit.
Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe
Evolution Intelligent Design\Creation Life After Death Religion
Aging Agriculture and Gardening Animal Experimentation Bone and Joint Health Cancer Earthing Environmental Genetics and Health Government Health Heart and Vascular Infectious Disease Medical Dangers Mental Health Nutrition Obesity Osteoporosis Pharmaceutical Dangers Religion Sleep Toxins Vision Vaccines
Exercise and Fitness
Alternative Med Amount Animals Artifact Change Death\Life After Disease\Organ Economy Environment Ethics Government Health History Learn Life's Difficulty Long Range View Modern Medicine Nutrition Origins Philosophy Qualities Quantum Reality Thinking Religion Self-Improvement Social Speech Spice
Logical Thinking Open Mindedness Truth Origins Fossils and Age Humans Have Not Evolved Biological Evidence for Creation Intelligent Design Quantum Reality Religion Free Will and Conscience Preternatural and Supernatural Mind Underlies Reality Life After Death Life's Purpose Genetic Context Exercise Aging Health and Prevention Dieting and Obesity Nutrition Medical Failure Self Responsibility Psychological Health Pet Health and Nutrition Environment Economics Politics Family Racism, Sexism, Ageism Education Lipid Nutrition Heart & Vascular Disease & Cholesterol