• Pregnancy is not a disease needing doctors
• Childbirth is not a disease needing doctors
• Active chidren is not a disease needing doctors

• Absence of disease is not a disease needing vaccinations and doctors
• Infancy is not a disease needing doctors
• Not being happy and content is not a disease needing doctors
• Not being fit or properly nourished is not a disease needing doctors
• Not being equal to everyone else is not a disease needing doctors--or government

JOHN KERRY EXPOSED ON CLIMATE INCOMPETENCE 

▶️ Click to play video

UNBRIDLED MONEY PRINTING HAS ALWAYS CAUSED THE DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATIONS 

Just going to get a sandwich

Click to read more

A VIBRANT ECONOMY--NOT
According to the Dec. 12, 2023 program by Shapiro, more than 80% of new jobs are in--

• Government
• Health care
• Hospitality and leisure

 
Paid for with taxes, printed money, and debt.
 
These job categories produce nothing. They are the demise of the once most robust, inventive, and productive economy the world has ever known.
 
 
TRANS DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
"The White House and the media commemorated the "trans day of remembrance" claiming that 26 people have been killed in anti-trans violence. Looking into the numbers you'll be shocked to learn that the claim is total nonsense. None of the 26 were harmed because they were trans."
 
 
MUSK AND ROGAN DISCUSS HOW CENSORING CAN BE THE END OF CIVILIZATION

▶️ Click to play video

FREE SPEECH
Listen to this short outtake from the court case in Missouri to understand that there is now government-sponsored book burning.

♫ Click to listen

HOPE 
✔︎ A recent broadcast of Tucker Carlson reached  427 million  people, which means that one out of every 14 people in the world saw it! 

✔︎ Joe Rogan has  3 billion  views on YouTube alone, not including his Spotify, Rumble, and X accounts.

✔︎ Elon Musk boasts  166 million  followers on X, making him one of the largest social media profiles in the world.
 

JURY NULLIFICATION CAN NULLIFY A DESPOTIC GOVERNMENT AND COURTS
Juries can not only determine the innocence or guilt of an accused, they can determine whether the law being used is fair. By voting innocent for a person who has broken an unfair law, the jury, in effect, overpowers the government.
 
Thomas Jefferson considered trial by jury as the anchor by which "government can be held to the principles of its constitution." The method, known as jury nullification, is an essential - and usually ignored - part of any strategy to advance liberty.
 
To the Founding generation, Trial by Jury was considered an indispensable tool against the power of government. Although supporters of the monster state today want juries to only judge the facts of the case before them, they actually have a duty to consider not just the facts, but the law itself. Path to Liberty: March 31, 2021 JOIN TAC: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/memb.
 
Go to https://fija.org/ to learn why and how to use jury nullification to take back our country.
 
 
COURT RULINGS FOR YOU JUST IN CASE

Second Amendment Rights
 In the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, the Supreme Court ruled that New York’s 1911 law that conditioned the right to a concealed carry permit on "good moral character" and "proper cause" was unconstitutional, as The Daily Wire reported. 
 
No local, state or federal public office with its public officers has the authority to ‘add to’ what the 2nd amendment declares such as …  on "good moral character" and "proper cause"
 
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the decision:   "We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need as amended by the New York Legislature in 1911…" "That Is Not How The First Amendment Works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion.  It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense."
 
READ BETWEEN THE LINES:  THINK  ABOUT  IT:  Same. with Peaceable assembly requiring permit,  redress of grievance demanding FOIAs
 
READ BETWEEN THE LINES:    Gould v Gould: 1917 -- referencing statutes HOWEVER applies to the States Declaration of Rights and the federal Bill of Rights --
 
In the interpretation of taxing statutes [[ and amendments of the Constitution and State Declaration of Rights ]] it is the established rule not to extend their provisions, by implication, beyond the clear import of the language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. Doubts are resolved against the Government.
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/james-woods-crushes-ny-dem-gov-hochul-after-she-slams-scotus-ending-concealed-carry-restrictions
 
 
FREE SPEECH - Creative Web Designer v Elenis
Quotes from the 6 page syllabus on the supreme court ruling of 70 pages.

• "colorado seeks to compel this speech in order to 'exercise certain ideas or viewpoints from the public debate. "

 

• "the 10th circuit thought that colorado could compel speech... this Court's First Amendment precedent teach otherwise. "

 

• "under colorado logic, the government may compel anyone... the First Amendment tolerates none of that. "

 

• "... the first amendment protects an individual's right to speak his mind regardless of whether the government considers his speech sensible and well intentioned or deeply 'misguided,... and likely to cause 'anguish' or 'incalculable grief,'... the government may not compel a person to speak its own preferred messages. "

 

• "in some sense, of courser, Mrs. Smith’s voice is unique: so is everyone's.  but that hardly means a state may coopt an individual's voice for their purpose. "

 

• "colordao seeks to compel just the sort of speech that it tacitly concedes lies beyond its reach. "

 

• "the First Amendment's protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy. "

 

• "colorado (nor any federal, state or local government employee) cannot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment. "

 
READ BETWEEN THE LINES:   "…cannot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment." Court is ruling ALL PROVISION OF  the 1st  Amendment
 
Definition of Credible Threat -- Justice Neil Gorsuch  --
Under Colorado’s logic and Colorado’s CADA, Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act,  if she wishes to speak, she must either speak as the State demands or initiate "a potentially burdensome administrative hearing" process including facing sanctions for expressing her own beliefs, sanctions that may include compulsory participation in "remedial training," filing periodic compliance reports, and paying monetary fines.  All this offends the First Amendment. That is an impermissible abridgement of the First Amendment’s right to speak freely.  
 
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/07/progressivedominated_college_town_to_pay_300k_to_christians_arrested_for_outdoor_church_service_during_covid_restrictions.html                       
 
 
TOWN TO PAY $300K TO CHRISTIANS ARRESTED FOR  OUTDOOR CHURCH SERVICE DURING COVID RESTRICTIONS
​​
EXCERPT ---   a reckoning is taking place for outrageous tyrannical government restrictions imposed on the populace during the COVID panic.  
 
The city of Moscow announced this week that $300,000.00 would settle with Gabriel Rench, Sean and Rachel Bohnet, who brought a case against city leaders in March 2021 that alleged their rights under the First and Fourth Amendments were violated when they were arrested at an outdoor "psalm sing" conducted by leaders from their church in September 2020.
 
Rench and the others were charged with violating the city's repeatedly extended health ordinance, which carved out exemptions for activities protected under the U.S. Constitution and the Idaho State Constitution, including religious activity.
 
A magistrate judge later dismissed the city's case against them, and U.S. District Court Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., wrote in his Feb. 1, 2023 memorandum and order denying the city's motion to dismiss that the "plaintiffs should never have been arrested in the first place, and the constitutionality of what the City thought [its] code said is irrelevant."
 
"Somehow, every single City official involved overlooked the exclusionary language [of constitutionally protected behavior] in the Ordinance," the judge further wrote.
 
It seems the so-called "liberals" of this college town resent people who assert their rights against government overreach and oppression:
 
And the bureaucrats and police — who went along with the arrests even as some  expressed regret — will suffer no personal penalty.  
           
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/05/montana-attorney-general-rules-many-aspects-of-critical-race-and-antiracism-training-are-unlawful/
 
 
CRITICAL RACE THEORY
Montana Attorney General Rules Many Aspects of Critical Race and "Antiracism" Training Are Unlawful.  
 
The Montana Attorney General outlines three prohibited categories to assist schools, other governmental entities, and employers with compliance: racial segregation, race stereotyping, and race scapegoating.  These concepts violate civil rights laws because they constitute racial harassment and/or require authority figures to engage in activities that result in different treatment on the basis of race.
 
Activities that fall under these categories that are discriminatory      
https://missouriindependent.com/2021/11/23/missouri-judge-local-covid-orders/


LOVE STILL ABOUNDS

▶️ Click to play video

▶️ Click to play video

▶️ Click to play video

---

Words of Wisdom:
Passivity comes from comfortable living.
​