Gravity is believed to be the force that makes things fall to the ground, holds everything in the heavens in their respective places, and is the cause of the particles from the big bang coalescing into planets, stars, and other heavenly bodies.

​It's like a god responsible for all the miraculous things of cosmogony (origin of the universe) and cosmology (the existing universe).
 
That's what we're told, taught, and think we see and experience day-to-day.
 
Gravity is considered an obvious fact as sure as 2+2=4.
 
It's even reduced to an equation: F = G(m₁m₂)/R², where the attractive gravitational force F is equal to G, the gravity constant, multiplied by the product of the masses (m₁ and m₂) and divided by the square of the distance between two objects, R.
 
This seems to give it the same surety and authority as 2+2=4.
 
But keep in mind that an equation does not necessarily equal truth. Each symbol in a formula must be a proven fact and no illogic must occur in the math.
 
For example. A glass(G) half full(F) is equal to a glass(G) half empty(E) can be reduced to the following equation: ½GlassFull=½Glass Empty
 
Using simple algebra, the ½s can be eliminated from each side of the equation.
 
When that's done, the result is GlassFull=GlassEmpty--nonsense.
 
As explored below, gravity equations have similar illogic. That, in part, is why Newton, Einstein, and Tesla said gravity is not the settled fact we are led to believe.
 
Let's explore gravity by asking these 50 obvious questions:
 
1. How could gravity hold loaded cement trucks down to the road but not hold down butterflies, helium balloons with 8000 lb payloads, not keep dust off computer screens, stop a seedling from growing vertically, keep water molecules from rising, or not flatten a folded napkin?
 
Massive NASA helium balloon with heavy payload tethered down and waiting to rise against gravity
​

⌕ Click to enlarge

​2. If the sun at 93 million miles away has gravity so powerful it can hold Earth, weighing 13,170,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pounds and spinning and rotating through space at millions of miles per hour, why can't Earth's gravity hold a magnetic train weighing only 1,048,000 lbs. down to the tracks? 

⌕ Click to enlarge
The Transrapid system uses servomechanisms to pull the train up from underneath the track and maintains a constant gap while travelling at high speed

​3. How could gravity hold oceans down but not the dew evaporating from the morning grass?

​4. Why are there no pictures from space showing ships and swimmers being held by gravity upside down on the bottom of the Earth globe?

⌕ Click to enlarge

5. How could gravity, a force dependent on mass, make things regardless of their mass, like a marble and a bus, fall at the same rate (9.8 meters/second squared)?

⌕ Click to enlarge

6. How could gravity (the weakest force known, see below) make planets and stars attract and hold to one another, keeping their positions, while orbiting, spinning, and gyrating through space at millions of mph?

▶️ Click to play video

​7. According to NASA, planets resulted from Big Bang interstellar dust and hydrogen gas forming a molecular cloud that contracted and accreted under the force of gravity. Why are there no experiments proving that gravity can form balls out of hydrogen and dust?

8. How could gravity pull things to Earth, while Einstein said the space-time medium, not gravity, does the pulling?
 
9. Why would Newton, said to be the discoverer of gravity, say this:

​In a letter to Dr Richard Bentley on Feb. 25th. 1692. Isaac Newton says:
 
"Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me SO GREAT AN ABSURDITY that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it."
 
Scheurer, PB., Debrock. G: Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. 1988. p.52
​

⌕ Click to enlarge

10. Why would gravity not cause all heavenly bodies to collapse upon one another, such as moons collapsing on their planets when on the opposite side of the planet to the sun?
​

⌕ Click to enlarge

​11. Why does gravity not explain things falling to Earth better than relative density which demands that things are drawn to Earth based on their density relative to the medium they are in?

⌕ Click to enlarge


⌕ Click to enlarge

​12. Earth's atmosphere is positive, the ground is negative. Why would the conclusions of Nikola Tesla be ignored?

"EARTH is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electro-magnetic levitation. Electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity."
​

⌕ Click to enlarge

13. Why would gravity be necessary when dielectric acceleration, magnetic attraction, density, and buoyancy (actual testable forces) explain attraction and repulsion in nature?

▶️ Click to play video

14. Henry Cavendish, in the late 1700s, devised an experiment to measure the specific gravity of Earth. In other words, Earth's density. This was later used to calculate the gravitational constant, the G in the formula: F=G(m₁m₂)/R​²

⌕ Click to enlarge

​So, if density is fundamental to why things layer or descend to Earth, why the need for a fabricated force, gravity?
 
15. Why is there no, and can be no experimental proof of gravity?

A scientific experiment requires an observed fact, called a dependent variable.
 
Determining the cause of this observed fact requires testing independent variables: things that may have caused the observed fact.
 
The independent variable being tested must be able to be varied to see the resulting impact on the dependent variable.
 
So, we watch an apple fall, an observed fact--a dependent variable.
 
We test different sizes of apples to see if mass is the independent variable cause of apples falling.
 
But no matter how big or small the apple, they all fall at the same rate.
 
We must therefore conclude that a force (gravity) acting upon mass is not the cause of apples falling.
​

 
16. Why is gravity believed when it violates a basic logical syllogism?

1. Weak or nonexistent forces cannot move or control gigantic masses moving at millions of miles per hour.
2. Gravity is a weak or nonexistent force.
3. Therefore, gravity does not move or control gigantic masses (stars, planets, moons, etc.) moving at millions of miles per hour.

 
17. Why should gravity be believed when its definition reduces to nonsense?
​​

Gravity is defined as the cause of mutual attraction between things with mass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
 
Mass is defined as resistance to acceleration. https://www.britannica.com/science/mass-physics
 
That means the definition of gravity is nonsense: mass attracting mass is resistance to acceleration attracting resistance to acceleration
​

18. In the formula for the force of gravity (F = G(m₁m₂)/R²), the mass of the two bodies in question, (m₁m₂), determines the force between them and thus the attraction and acceleration they should have toward one another. Then why does a really big apple mass (m₁), compared to a really small apple mass (m₁), fall to the Earth, the (m₂), at the same speed?

19. In Einstein's general relativity, gravity is not a force between masses. Instead, gravity is an effect of the warping of space and time in the presence of mass. If the attraction of masses to one another is due to the curvature of space-time, not gravity, according to Einstein, why believe in gravity?
 
20. The four fundamental forces are said to be strong and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism, and gravity.
​

​Their relative strengths are:
 
a. Strong Nuclear:
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ( 10⁴¹ )

b. Electromagnetic:
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ( 10³⁸ )

c. Weak Nuclear:
​100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ( 10²⁵ )

​d. Gravity: " 1 "
 
How could anyone conclude anything other than gravity being nonexistent or "incredibly feeble"?
​

21. Since electromagnetism has a strength of 100000000000000000000000000000000000000 and can exert an attractive force between bodies, whereas gravity, by comparison, only has a force of 1, if even that, how could there be any experiment devised to extract the minuscule effect of gravity ("signal") from the overwhelming background force ("noise") of electromagnetism?
​

22. Real things like electromagnetism and microwaves can be manipulated. For example, electromagnetic motors and microwave ovens can be regulated with simple dials. So why, if gravity is a real thing, is there no magnetic machine with a dial and no way to manipulate it?
 
23. The entire universe is said to have been assembled by gravity causing small things to coalesce into big spherical things like stars, planets, etc. So why has gravity never been observed or proven to assemble small things into big spheres?
 
24. Why do helium, hydrogen, and fluorocarbons defy gravity by not being held down to the Earth?
 
25. Put a drinking straw in a glass of water. Suck the water in the straw vertically up the straw. The vacuum you create with your lungs is about 7 psi, half of atmospheric pressure. That is nowhere near the vacuum created by space.
 
Torr is a measure of pressure related to vacuum. The atmosphere is 760 Torr, your lungs can do half that. Space is 0.00000000000000001 Torr.
 
So why, if your lungs can pull a liquid that is heavier than air vertically against the supposed force of gravity, would the vacuum of space, millions of times more powerful than your lungs, not be able to suck the gases in our atmosphere away from the supposed gravitational force holding them to Earth?

⌕ Click to enlarge

26. Gravity is said to be a nonphysical force. But how can that be so since force is defined as physical mass multiplied by acceleration?
 
27. The weakest of all forces, gravity, is said to keep planets rotating around the sun, like the Earth at 93 million miles away from it and Neptune at 2.8 billion miles away from it. How can this be when, according to the gravity formula, F = G(m1m2)/R2 (R is the radius distance), the force is diminished by being divided by the square of the distance between them? Why would such massive distances not nullify even the strongest forces between masses, let alone the weakest force, gravity?
 
28. Why do popular authoritative sources say gravity is the weakest of all forces and then contradict themselves by saying this negligible force is responsible for the formation and control of the universe?
 
How is this not an expression of religious, not scientific, belief?

 Britannica says of gravity:
"It is by far the weakest known force in nature and thus plays no role in determining the internal properties of everyday matter. On the other hand, through its long reach and universal action, it controls the trajectories of bodies in the solar system and elsewhere in the universe and the structures and evolution of stars, galaxies, and the whole cosmos."
 
Wikipedia says this:
"Gravity is, by far, the weakest of the four fundamental interactions, approximately 10³⁸ times weaker than the strong interaction, 10³⁶​ times weaker than the electromagnetic force, and 10²⁹ times weaker than the weak interaction. As a result, it has no significant influence at the level of subatomic particles.[2] However, gravity is the most significant interaction between objects at the macroscopic scale, and it determines the motion of planets, stars, galaxies, and even light."
​

29. How could the weakest force known that plays no role in affecting everyday matter, like dust and gas, form the countless gazillions of tons of stars and planets out of dust and gas?

Britannica says this about the action of gravity on dust and gas:
"It is by far the weakest known force in nature and thus plays no role in determining the internal properties of everyday matter."
 
Space.com says this about the formation of the cosmos:
"Solar system formation began approximately 4.5 billion years ago, when gravity pulled a cloud of dust and gas together to form our solar system."

30. Why can a vacuum machine pick up heavy objects and thus defy gravity, but the vacuum of space, millions of times more powerful than vacuum machines, not suck planets and stars away from orbits supposedly held by the weakest force, gravity?
 
31. Gravity is supposedly capable of holding trillions of tons of objects down to Earth. So why can we puny humans overpower the gravity of Earth every time we pick up a fork, jump into the air, or lift over a thousand pounds of barbells?

⌕ Click to enlarge

​ 
32. Quantum mechanics is the underlying explanation for our physical reality. So why are there quantum explanations for all physical forces except gravity?
 
33. How can gravity make things stick to one another and orbit one another at the same time?
 
34. How can the gravity from the sun hold Neptune in place billions of miles away from it but not be powerful enough to cause tides on Earth?
 
35. Why, if the moon's gravity can lift the oceans at high tide, do we not weigh less when standing by the ocean at high tide?

⌕ Click to enlarge

​36. Why, in a gravitational battle for the moon, does the sun not win and pull the moon to it and speed up the moon when it is on the sun's side of the Earth?

According to the gravitational equation, the sun's mass wins the pulling contest for the moon by a factor of roughly 333,000. The Earth pulls by a factor of roughly 152,000. Net is a 2 to 1 win for the Sun over the Earth which means the moon would have long ago exploded into the sun
​

Click to view more

⌕ Click to enlarge

​37. If the moon should be sucked into the sun due to gravity, why would the ISS, spaceships, and astronauts not meet the same fate?

⌕ Click to enlarge

38. The second law of thermodynamics, a scientific law, in simple terms says things on their own become disorganized, they lose order. We live, see, and experience this law every day. So how could the solar system and universe be and remain so highly ordered due to gravity, which is the weakest of all forces and is not a scientific law, or even a theory?
 
39. If gravity is strong enough to hold oceans down to Earth, why can't it pull space-walking astronauts (if there is such a thing) down to it?
 
40. If gravity is real, why does NASA have to fake zero gravity with CGI and zero gravity planes.?
 
41. If gravity is real, there should be no rain since it would prevent water molecules from moving up into the atmosphere to form rain clouds.
 
42. Why are there places on Earth that defy the supposed gravitational force?

Click to view more

​Other examples of anti-gravity.
 
43. The sun is said to be 98% hydrogen and helium, the two atoms with the least mass. Since mass supposedly determines gravity, how could the sun exert the tremendous force necessary to hold the entire solar system together? This is particularly problematic when everything in the heavens is millions and billions of miles away from the sun and traveling at millions of miles per hour under known inertial/centrifugal forces far exceeding speculated gravitational forces. (Explored further here.)
 
 
44. The inverse square law of gravity states that the gravitational attractive force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two masses.
 
This is how the law works with light. Notice how much the light diminishes from 2 meters to 4 meters.
​

Click to view more

​So this is how the sun would look to Neptune 2.8 billion miles, not meters, away from it.

Click to view more

In other words, the sun would not even be visible from Neptune. So how could the weakest force known, gravity, from the gaseous sun hold the gaseous Neptune in place 2.8 billion miles away from it while they are traveling at millions of miles per hour in multiple directions?
 
45. Why would George Musser, PhD Astrophysics, say: "We can, We do, We must, consider Newtonian Gravity as a force. Now that doesn’t really mean it is one, but we don’t necessarily have to work on the REALLY IS level." https://youtu.be/SK9-gYCKKq (video taken down)
 
46. Why does Erik Verlinde, physics professor, and string theorist, say, "gravity doesn't exist"
 
47. Why does Thomas Winship say, "The 'law of gravitation' is said by the advocates of the Newtonian system of astronomy, to be the greatest discovery of science, and the foundation of the whole of modern astronomy. If, therefore it can be shown that gravitation is pure assumption, and an imagination of the mind only, that it has no existence outside of the brains of it's founders and advocates, the whole of the hypotheses of this modern science fall to the ground as flat as the surface of the ocean, and this 'most exact of all sciences,' this wonderful 'feat of the intellect' becomes at once the most ridiculous superstition and the most gigantic imposture to which ignorance and credulity could ever be exposed."?—Thomas Winship, "Zetetic Cosmogeny"
 
48. Einstein, Hawking, Hubble, Hoyle, and other scientists say there is no proof that the Earth is moving.
 
If the Earth is not moving, that destroys the entire spinning ball infinite universe and the gravity that supposedly made it all happen and holds it together.
 
49. Gravity supposedly caused the cosmic dust from the Big Bang to coalesce into highly ordered planetary systems. In other words, the chaos from an explosion created the highly ordered universe and us.
 
But that's impossible since the Second Law of Thermodynamics demands that things spontaneously become disordered, not ordered.

⌕ Click to enlarge


⌕ Click to enlarge

How could a tried-and-true natural law be defeated by and coexist with a guess, gravity?
 
50. William Casey, a CIA Director, said: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." The "we" he refers to is the US government.
 
NASA is a government agency and primary proponent of a cosmology that requires gravity as its primary force.
 
So, why would the government's gravity doctrine not be disinformation?
​

Click to view more

Conclusion
The gravity god is a false god and means the Big Bang, spinning ball, infinite universe, life from pond sludge, cosmogony, and cosmology religion is false as well.

---

As to why we have been indoctrinated into something entirely different than this reality, see Part 1.

---

Words of Wisdom:
Gravity is an imaginary force that holds all their lies together.